Just out todayClimate & energy tech: We ran the Ibadan solar forecast ourselves. Every number came back.AI agents & MCP: What a 49.1% attack rate does not tell youCybersecurity: The MCP scanner number that should worry you

Research Radar/Drones & autonomous vehicles/USA · Germany

47 experts list 12 things blocking drone fleets by 2035

A US workshop of 47 experts named 12 technical challenges standing between today's drones and fleets that work like national infrastructure. It is a vision report with no experiment.

What the paper found

A Computing Research Association workshop of 47 experts, held over two days in December 2025, produced a report naming 12 technical challenges that must be solved before drone fleets can scale by 2035. It also sets 2028 checkpoints, including fleets of 10 to 50 drones completing 99 percent of missions without human help in controlled settings. No experiment was run.

Grade 7 reading level5 min read

What happened

You can build a very good car in a country with no roads. It will still be a very good car. However, it will not take you anywhere useful.

That is where drones sit right now, according to a new report. The flying machines are cheap and capable. However, the software, the rules and the shared plumbing behind them are not ready. The report calls this the capability gap.

Therefore, 47 people sat in a room for two days and made a list. Twelve things must be fixed before drone fleets can work at the scale of a road network.

The test

There is no test. This is important, so read it twice. The report is a vision document, so nobody ran an experiment, flew a fleet or measured anything. It records what a group of experts agreed on.

The report is “Computing on the Fly: Navigating a Vision for the Future of Drone Computing”. It is dated July 2026 and was published by the Computing Research Association in Washington DC, through its Computing Community Consortium.

Seven people are listed as authors. They are Kevin Butler of the University of Florida, Christopher Stewart of The Ohio State University, and Nils Aschenbruck of Osnabrück University in Germany. The others are Alina Gerall of the Computing Research Association, Weisong Shi of the University of Delaware, Ufuk Topcu of the University of Texas, and Deborah Silver of Rutgers University. Others contributed too. They include people from Purdue University, the University of Minnesota, the engineering firm Burgess and Niple, and the drone operator DroneUp.

The workshop itself ran on 1 and 2 December 2025, at a hotel in Washington DC. It brought together 47 experts from universities, companies and government. They worked through four rounds of breakout groups over the two days.

The result

The group named 12 technical challenges. Some are about size: scaling to millions of drones, and building reliable fleets from parts that are not predictable. Some are about the machinery in between, such as edge and cloud coordination and the drone networks themselves. Some are about safety, such as security, identity, and guarding key infrastructure. The rest cover data for training and testing, human oversight, standards and rules, and training people to do the work.

The useful part is the 2028 checkpoints, and they are specific. A fleet of 10 to 50 drones finishing 99 percent of missions with no human help, in controlled settings. Safety checking tools that watch a network of up to 100,000 parameters and raise an alert inside 10 milliseconds. Attack detection with a safe fallback inside 100 milliseconds. Twenty or more drones from different organisations working together with no central boss, through 50 percent packet loss and five second blackouts.

The plumbing targets are just as concrete. A national testbed at 10 or more sites. A shared library of over 1,000 hours of failure recordings. Simulations that handle 1,000 or more drones. Training setups at 20 universities.

What it means

Reports like this shape money. This is because research funders and policy staff read them and write programmes from them. If you build in this field, the 12 headings tell you which pitches will find a friendly ear over the next few years.

They also tell you where the holes are. This is because a shared library of 1,000 hours of drone failure footage does not exist. Neither does a 10 site national testbed. Somebody has to build those, and the report says out loud that they are needed.

Read the 2028 checkpoints as product specifications, because they came from people who buy and fund this work. Each one is a gap with a number attached.

Business ideas from this paper

  1. Sell a recorded library of drone failure footage, covering sensor faults, bad weather and jamming. Who buys it: drone autonomy teams and university labs who cannot break their own aircraft often enough. A price to test: 1,200 dollars a year per seat. A one-week test: record 10 hours of deliberate failures with one cheap drone, put 30 minutes online free, and email the link to 20 autonomy teams.
  2. Sell half-day flight test slots at a private site where customers can deliberately break things. Who buys it: small drone firms who cannot get airspace or permission of their own. A price to test: 2,000 dollars a slot, staff included. A one-week test: get one landowner to agree, list three dates, and see whether anyone books and pays a deposit.
  3. Sell a short course on fleet software and the rules that are coming, for people who already fly. Who buys it: inspection and survey firms with pilots but no software staff. A price to test: 400 dollars a seat. A one-week test: run one online session, cap it at 25 seats, and take payment before you build the slides.

How sure can you be?

THIS REPORT CONTAINS NO EVIDENCE, BECAUSE IT WAS NEVER MEANT TO. It is a record of agreement, not a record of measurement. On our scoring it earns nothing for strength of evidence, and that is the correct score for a vision paper.

Every number in the checkpoints is a target somebody set, not a result somebody achieved. The 99 percent mission completion figure is a wish for 2028. No fleet has done it. Therefore, treat those numbers as goals, and never quote them as findings.

The group was assembled, not sampled. Forty-seven people came together for two days. Some of them work for drone companies and engineering firms named in the report. That is normal for this kind of workshop, and it still shapes what gets onto the list.

The view is mostly from the United States. The report says it is written for policymakers, research funders, startups, investors and researchers, and it talks about positioning the United States. Only one listed author is based outside it. What would settle the question is simple. Wait until 2028 and count how many of the checkpoints were met.

Do this today

Open section 4.1 of the report and read the 2028 checkpoints. Pick the one closest to what you already build, and treat it as a written brief from a customer who has not paid you yet.

Source: Computing on the Fly: Navigating a Vision for the Future of Drone Computing, Computing Community Consortium, Computing Research Association, July 2026. arXiv:2607.19213 · arxiv.org (report or dataset).

Just Out Tech explains new research in plain language. This article was drafted with AI assistance and checked by a human against the original source.

What to remember
  • The report names 12 technical challenges, from scaling to millions of drones to workforce training, and calls the shortfall a capability gap where hardware is ahead of software and rules.
  • Its 2028 checkpoints are specific, including fleets of 10 to 50 drones finishing 99 percent of missions with no human help and attack detection with a safe fallback inside 100 milliseconds.
  • The report is a record of what 47 experts agreed over two days in December 2025, with no experiment, no measurement and no data of its own.
Where this really is

A consensus report from the CCC 'Computing on the Fly' workshop in December 2025. 47 experts from academia, industry and government named 12 technical challenges. No experiment, prototype or deployment is reported.

When it reaches you
Someone has to build the national testbed consortium and the verification tools the report asks for. Our estimate is not before the 2030s, because the report puts a first 1,000-drone demonstration at 2028 and dates the full non-military vision to 2035.
Who is building on it
Published by the Computing Research Association's Computing Community Consortium. Industry people are named among the authors and attendees: Andy Thurling of DroneUp, Mike Kronander and Terry Mullins of Burgess & Niple, Inc., Matt Welsh of Palantir, and Anne Marie Kelly of IEEE-CS. No code, data or model release is mentioned.
Who paid for the research
The IEEE Computer Society paid for the workshop. The Computing Community Consortium paid through the U.S. National Science Foundation under Grant No. 2300842. The report notes its findings do not necessarily reflect NSF views.

Questions people ask

what are the 12 drone computing challenges?

They are scaling to millions of drones, AI intelligence and assurance, the edge to cloud continuum and real-time coordination, AI autonomy and agentic systems, data and training and validation infrastructure, critical infrastructure protection, building reliable fleets from non-deterministic agents, trust and security and distributed authentication, next-generation drone networks, human and AI partnership with scalable oversight, standards and certification and regulation, and workforce development and education.

is this report based on experiments?

No. It is a vision document from a workshop held on 1 and 2 December 2025 in Washington DC. Forty-seven experts from academia, industry and government worked through four rounds of breakout groups. Nothing was measured or tested.

what is the capability gap?

It is the report's term for the fact that drone hardware and ambitions are moving faster than the software and systems needed to run drones safely at scale. In other words, the machines are ready before the plumbing around them is.

what should be true by 2028 according to the report?

Among other things, fleets of 10 to 50 drones completing 99 percent of missions without human help in controlled settings, safety tools that alert within 10 milliseconds while watching networks of up to 100,000 parameters, a national testbed at 10 or more sites, over 1,000 hours of shared failure recordings, and simulations covering 1,000 or more drones. These are targets, not results.

About the author

Mark Alex

Mark Alex is the founder and Managing Director of Real Biz Digital, a technology company operating out of Nairobi since 2018. He works in agentic AI and the Model Context Protocol, AI governance, enterprise software architecture and cybersecurity. He holds an MSc in Mechatronical Engineering from Obuda University in Budapest and a BSc in IT, Forensic Technology and Cybercrime, from USIU-Africa in Nairobi, and has published IEEE conference research on an AI-powered digital twin for greenhouse systems. He is the author of seven books. Between 2020 and 2024 he mentored more than 200 university students and interns in Nairobi. He writes every Just Out Tech article from the original research paper.